Updated Class of 2027 Player Rankings (December)
December 16, 2025

Follow on Twitter- @PrepBaseballOH
Follow on Twitter- @PrepBaseOHScout
Follow on Instagram- @prepbaseballohio
Updated Class of 2027 Player Rankings (December)
This update resulted in only minor movement, but it allowed us to take a deeper look at the class as projections continue to come into focus. While the amount of new gameplay since the last release has been limited, there were still key fall events that provided additional data points on this group. As we move deeper into the evaluation cycle for the Ohio 2027 class, the picture continues to sharpen through a combination of those looks, ongoing physical development, clearer positional definition, and recruiting outcomes that have begun to validate earlier evaluations.
One of the most telling indicators from this update is how well the Future Games roster has held up over time. That group was selected with projection in mind, not just present ability, and the results since then have only reinforced the evaluations made at that event.
To view the Class Rankings, click below:
To view the Prospect Reports, click below:
To view the entire Class of 2027 rankings, please click here.
What The Future Games Roster Tells Us
The Future Games roster consisted of 25 players. As of this update, 20 of those players are committed. That is an 80 percent commitment rate, and it spans every area of the field.
Those commitments are not clustered around one position group or one recruiting style. They include high-major programs, Power Four schools, and strong regional Division I programs that have a track record of developing players. Ohio State, Toledo, Kent State, Notre Dame, Mississippi State, Virginia Tech, Arizona, West Virginia, Cincinnati, and Louisville are all represented.
When viewed collectively, the roster provides strong confirmation that the evaluations made at that event translated well to the college level.
Position Group Breakdown
The infield group converted at a high rate. Both third basemen from the roster are committed, and all of the shortstop and middle infielders from the group have found Division I homes. These were players who showed defensive reliability, athleticism, and offensive traits that project forward, and recruiting outcomes reflected that.
Behind the plate, two of the three catchers are committed to programs that place a premium on defense, game management, and long-term development. Catchers often move later in the recruiting cycle, so seeing that level of conversion early is a positive sign.
The outfield group produced four commitments out of five players, including representation from the SEC, ACC, Big Ten, and strong mid-major programs. That group combined athleticism, defensive value, and offensive upside, which continues to be the most consistent recruiting formula for outfielders.
On the mound, nine of the eleven pitchers from the roster are committed. That group includes both right-handed and left-handed arms, power profiles, and pitchers who project based on body, movement quality, and strike-throwing ability. Ohio State alone accounted for multiple arms from the group, which speaks to the trust placed in those evaluations.
Risers Who Continue To Build Momentum
Movement within the rankings was measured, but several players continue to trend upward as additional information becomes available.
Lucas Reder made one of the most significant jumps in the class. That movement reflects physical development and a clearer offensive identity. As the bat has become a more consistent carrying tool, the overall profile has sharpened.
David Ternosky continues to move in the right direction as his game slows down and becomes more controlled. The defensive actions in the middle of the field remain reliable, and the offensive approach has taken steps forward.
Luke Wardwell has made notable progress behind the plate. Improvements in receiving and overall athleticism have strengthened the profile, and those gains tend to show up quickly in catcher evaluations.
Landon Vennettilli and Conner Draper are examples of players who have benefitted from increased exposure and consistency. Both continue to show instincts and feel that allow their tools to play in game settings.
Carson Stickley has steadily climbed as the athleticism and offensive impact have become more apparent. The trend line remains positive moving forward.
What This Update Reflects
This update is less about reactionary movement and more about confirmation. The Future Games roster served as a strong checkpoint for the class, and the recruiting results that followed reinforce the evaluations made at that time. At the same time, incremental risers are beginning to separate as bodies change, roles become clearer, and projection sharpens.
The back half of the rankings remains fluid, and the spring will create new opportunities for players to force their way into the conversation. For now, the foundation of the Ohio 2027 class is solid, and the direction is clear.
These rankings are a snapshot, not a final statement. The process continues, and the evaluations will evolve as the class does.
***** To view the entire rankings, please click here.
Recent Articles
- OH Updated Class of 2027 Player Rankings (December) 12/16/25
- OH Updated Class of 2026 Player Rankings (December) 12/10/25
- OH Updated Class of 2028 Player Rankings (December) 12/02/25
- OH Initial Class of 2029 Player Rankings (November) 11/24/25
- OH Signing Period: Recruiting Class Breakdown 11/12/25
- OH 2025 Showcase Statistical Leaderboard: Trackman Analytics - Pitching Leaderboard 11/05/25
- OH 2025 Showcase Statistical Leaderboard: Trackman Analytics - Hitting Leaderboard 11/05/25
- OH 2025 Showcase Statistical Leaderboard: Defense Analytics Leaderboard 11/05/25
- OH 2025 Southern Ohio Fall Top Prospect Games - Top Statistical Performers 10/13/25
- OH 2025 Southern Ohio Unsigned Senior Showcase - Top Statistical Performers 10/13/25
